All The Laws That Are Fit To (3-D) Print

Coming around to this bit of news again, let me explain why this is a big deal.

Significantly, the government expressly acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber – including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms – are not inherently military.

Heller vs. D.C., the Supreme Court case the secured the right to keep and bear arms for the foreseeable future, wasn’t won because a team of lawyers marched up the steps of the courthouse waving Gadsden flag and yelling “MUH RIGHTS!!!!!.” Rather, it was won because a team of smart lawyers used legal precedents to make it clear to the court (well, MOST of the court) that the right to keep and bear arms was an individual right of the citizen, not a collective right of the state.

Now that the DOJ has ruled that AR-15’s and 1911’s are not inherently “military” weapons, there is precedent to go after “assault weapons” bans that are based on getting “weapons of war” off our streets.

This ruling, along with the nomination of the guy who (rightly) stated that AR-15’s are in common use and should not be banned, foretells of great things to come for the gun rights movement.

Let freedom ring!

This Post Has One Comment

  1. There is also now the required info to challenge the NFA on full auto based on the US v Miller.

Comments are closed.