Match Report, Louland Pistol, 12-17-19

Or, (dry fire) practice makes is making perfect. I shot this match as a test drive for the new CZ75, and aside from problems with one mag, it went pretty well. Let’s roll the tape!

Stage 1: (Not Shown). Traditionally, I’ve sucked on this stage at this match because it’s full of pepper poppers and plate racks. This time, though, I rocked it, posting one of the fastest non-Open runs of the match.
And of course, I didn’t record it. Figures.

Stage 2: Speaking of rocking a run, I’m tickled pink with this stage. Aside from a couple of dropped shots and a rather lackadaisical draw, everything else is right where I want it to be. In fact, when I got to that second-to-last string of three steel targets, I recognized how close they were and put the pedal to the metal, shooting them as fast as my little trigger finger would go.

Stage 3: Again, a rather good stage for me. I stopped when I didn’t need to about halfway through the run to engage a target on my right I could have shot from an earlier position, but that’s about it. My hits were there (2/3rd’s “A’s”, no “D’s”, no misses) and I even managed to spot a problem with the center target in that last group of targets and turn a Charlie-Delta into an Alpha-Charlie.
I’ll take it.

Stage 4: Mag issue. The ammo in my mag had stacked up, and I misdiagnosed the problem as a double-feed. Still a pretty good run, though, even with that and a dropped shot.

Stage 5: I didn’t get a good grip on the gun during the draw, and it affected my accuracy and messed with my head. That mag issue popped up again as well (Memo to self: order new mag springs, stat), but I handled it better this time with a tap-rack-bang. Oh well, if every stage was a good one, you wouldn’t know where to improve.

Overall, I’m happy with how I shot this match, and pleased with the progress I’m making. I see a couple of places for improvement: My draw is slow and my movement is even slower, but those are areas I can tackle in the gym and with dry-fire.

Are You Ready? Stand by. You’re Not Ready? Well, Too Bad for You.

http://www.exurbanleague.com/Portals/2/PRGC.jpg

Living in Southwest Florida this past year has made me realize just how good I had it back in Arizona. I had access to the pistol bays at Rio Salado on a first-come, first-served basis, and I could shoot a match every day except Friday. Even in Missouri, I had a range pretty much to myself except for a few days each month and could go shoot anytime I wanted.

Here, however, that’s not the case. The ranges here are either indoor ranges which don’t allow drawing from the holster or they’re outdoor ranges that don’t rent out pistol bays during the day. This means I do a lot of dry-fire in-between shooting matches, and it’s also made me more sympathetic to new gun owners who want to do more with their guns than go to the range and punch holes in paper.

Hunting needs a welcome mat, and so does practical shooting. Participation in practical shooting suffers, I think, because everything about it is driven by competition. You can’t really participate in the sport in any way without going to a match. Imagine how popular jogging would be if the only reason people did it was to run marathons, not get in shape. Thousands and thousands of people ski, yet only a few hundred compete.

Competition is good for long-term participation in a sport: There is really no such thing as competitive scuba diving, and what happens in that sport? The vast majority of people try it, enjoy it, and then give up after two years or so, because there is no reason to push themselves beyond what they already can do. Rob Leatham is trying to solve this with his “Intro to Steel” matches, which are fun, easy and lightweight, but they are still a competition. Here in Southwest Florida, Step By Step Gun Training puts on a bimonthly “shoot and scoot” event, which is a low-key move and shoot event where the RO is there to help you get better, not be an impartial judge and timekeeper. Scores aren’t tracked officially, and it’s quite popular in this small town, with two dozen people showing up on a Sunday morning, paying $40 each. In this neck of the woods, it’s essentially the only time that local people can draw and shoot from a holster without the pressure of a match.

There really isn’t an on-ramp in-between a booth at an indoor range or a stall at an outdoor range and practical shooting. There are very, very few public ranges that allow drawing from the holster, and ZERO that allow moving with a loaded gun: You have to learn how to do that the first day you show up at a match, along with all the other 1,350 rules of the game (triple that number of rules if it’s IDPA). The .22 sports, (Rimfire Challenge, Scholastic Steel) which are designed (in theory) to get people into practical shooting don’t address the issues of movement and drawing from a holster, as they’re essentially bullseye with target transitions. The problem is, anything that doesn’t address carrying your gun in a holster does not address the needs of Gun Culture 2.0. For today’s urban gun owner, who can’t bip out to his backyard and shoot and doesn’t have access to Forestry land or a pistol bay, you either take a class, or shoot a match. There is nothing else set up for regular live-fire practice for drawing from a holster and moving for someone who lives in a city, and that needs to change.

Visual Clues

Why does every stage we’ve ever shot begin with an audible start signal? How hard could it be it integrate some kind of connecter into a CED (or other) timer that would allow for some shooter-initiated action to start the timer? Humans are not bats, we rely on sight, not sound to get around in our environment. Despite this, every stage begins with “Are you ready? Standby… BEEP!”

What if a stage began with the shooter reacting to a visual signal, such as a random popper falling from a tripwire controlled by the RO or something similar? Where in the rulebook does it say that the start signal always has to be audible?

 

Hunting is May Issue. Practical Shooting is Shall Issue.

Thinking more about last week’s article for Bearing Arms, everything about hunting is about getting past the gatekeepers. You need your safety class, then your tags, then you need to find someplace to hunt or someone to show you where to hunt. There are checkpoints along the way to make sure you’re the “right type of person” to hunt, and even then, you may not get a chance to hunt if you don’t have the right connections.

In other words, “May Issue” concealed carry.

Practical shooting, though, is different. If you have something even close to the right gear for the match and have a basic understanding of gun safety, you shoot. You may have to go through a safety briefing and have a more experienced shooter guide you through the match, but if you show up, you shoot.

“Shall Issue”.

Which path leads to growth? Well, that one’s not hard to figure out.

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Match Etiquette

A great run-down on how not to be a jerk at a practical shooting match.

“The core thing to remember is that most matches only happen thanks to the generosity of time from the volunteer staff. They’re there because they love the sport and want to help others. As long as you respect that, help out, and don’t be a jerk, you’ll be more than halfway to being a good competitor.”

Also, as volunteers, the people at a match love to have new people show up, because the more people shoot, the easier the jobs get for everyone.

Man To Man To Some Other Man

Thinking more about my comment from last week,

It’s rather rare to have more than two shooters with the same Classification/Division on any given squad, making man-to-man comparisons pretty much impossible.

Maybe that’s another reason why practical shooting sucks to watch in person. Yes, there are Super Squads stuffed to the gills with people at the top of the game, but even within the Super Squad, you’ll have Production shooters and Open Shooters and Limited Shooters and even a few freaks shooting wheel guns, so when that squad runs through a stage, at best you’ll have three runs that can be directly compared to each other, and those runs will probably be interspersed between the other ten or so people on the squad, killing the tension and suspense.

Watching, say, Max vs. Chris Tilley vs. KC compete in Open is exciting. Watching Max shoot Open, then Jerry shoot Revolver and Rob shoot Single Stack and Chris Tilley shoot Open and Nils shoot Limited and Phil shoot Limited and THEN AND ONLY THEN watch KC shoot in Open is whole lot less so.

We're All On The Same Team. And That's A Bad Thing.

Thinking more about the shooting sports as a television sport, why is it that in a sport that is all about about intense competition, there are zero rivalries? Football grew in the 70’s when it was the clean-cut Cowboys vs the bad boys of Oakland or Pittsburgh. Basketball grew with Bird vs. Magic (and then Jordan). Baseball grew with the dominance of the Yankees in the 20’s/30’s. In each of these cases, we had someone to root for and we had someone to root against.

Cubs fans, of course, continue to cheer for their team, and cheerfully deny reality.

I digress.

It’s great that everyone in practical shooting pretty much gets along and helps each other out. That sort of thing makes it a fun sport to shoot every weekend, but it makes for lousy TV because there is nothing to get excited about. We like to cheer for the rebels, the rule-breakers. NASCAR blossomed when there was a face/heel competition between good ol’ boy Dale Earnhardt and slick Yankee Jeff Gordon. Who are the rebels in practical shooting? Where are the rivalries? Why isn’t Glock vs. S&W vs. Sig as big a deal as Ferrari vs. McLaren vs. Mercedes?

Top Shot did this brilliantly. Yes, there was constant whinging from shooters about the drama, but you know what? We also secretly and not-so-secretly cheered for our heroes and booed for villains. We complained, but it worked.

Give us conflict. Give us rivalries. Give us somebody/something to cheer for, and we’ll give you the ratings.

We’re All On The Same Team. And That’s A Bad Thing.

Thinking more about the shooting sports as a television sport, why is it that in a sport that is all about about intense competition, there are zero rivalries? Football grew in the 70’s when it was the clean-cut Cowboys vs the bad boys of Oakland or Pittsburgh. Basketball grew with Bird vs. Magic (and then Jordan). Baseball grew with the dominance of the Yankees in the 20’s/30’s. In each of these cases, we had someone to root for and we had someone to root against.

Cubs fans, of course, continue to cheer for their team, and cheerfully deny reality.

I digress.

It’s great that everyone in practical shooting pretty much gets along and helps each other out. That sort of thing makes it a fun sport to shoot every weekend, but it makes for lousy TV because there is nothing to get excited about. We like to cheer for the rebels, the rule-breakers. NASCAR blossomed when there was a face/heel competition between good ol’ boy Dale Earnhardt and slick Yankee Jeff Gordon. Who are the rebels in practical shooting? Where are the rivalries? Why isn’t Glock vs. S&W vs. Sig as big a deal as Ferrari vs. McLaren vs. Mercedes?

Top Shot did this brilliantly. Yes, there was constant whinging from shooters about the drama, but you know what? We also secretly and not-so-secretly cheered for our heroes and booed for villains. We complained, but it worked.

Give us conflict. Give us rivalries. Give us somebody/something to cheer for, and we’ll give you the ratings.

Brand Evangelists

This new graphic from the National Shooting Sports Federation dramatically illustrates the changes in America’s gun culture over the past few years. We’re more urban, we took up shooting later in life, and we’re more likely than ever to gender-indentify as a woman and/or as Caitlyn Jenner.

Gun-Culture-20

Two telling stats there:

  1. 56% of new target shooters live in urban/suburban areas. Think they’re shooting on an outdoor range? Me neither. Why, then, do none of the practical shooting sports have a dedicated outreach program to indoor ranges? IDPA has the Indoor Nationals and you can shoot GSSF indoors, but you know how much info I received on both those competitions when we opened up Florida’s first luxury shooting range? Zero. Zip. Square root of zilch. I had to go chase down that info for myself.
    Dear IDPA: Create a tri-fold brochure on why indoor ranges want to add IDPA competitions. Emphasize how competitors buy a lot more stuff than plinkers, and train more as well. Then set up a Google Alert for “New Indoor Shooting Range” and send out your brochure whenever it fires off. Total cost: Maybe a grand. Total number of new yearly IDPA members: Probably a grand as well.
  2. The average age is down eleven years, yet the the percentage of people getting started after 18 is up almost 300%. Do millennials and digital natives like guns? You betcha!

A Man Alone Is A Target.

motivator13216bd5a188f0f305a9ccd7a343f7353bfd141b-580x464

This. This is why competition is absolutely vital if you’re serious about armed self-defense.

I wasn’t being honest with myself about where I needed to be practicing. My reload speed didn’t need improvement. My grip on the gun did. My trigger press did. I was so desperately trying to be better than I am that I flat out ignored something I know very well as an instructor: too many people try to run before they crawl.  There is only one person who can fix that.

I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve seen people in a “tactical pistol” class concentrate too hard on the “tactical” elements and not enough on the “pistol”. The fact is, though, the sooper-sekrit ninja moves are fun, trigger press and transitions are not fun. However, competition is fun, and competition will show you were you suck faster than almost anything else out there.